Take a guided tour of the Dekita Orchard.
Below, you will be able to follow feeds from the Connectivism course, ELT participants and other sources of interest. Click on a folder to view individual feeds; click on a text link to read the most recent posts.
The Orchard runs on Gregarius.
Edney de Souza (Interney) is in charge of the Campus Blog at the 2nd edition of the national Campus Party, which will take place in São Paulo from January 19th to 25th 2009.
The mega event, sponsored by Futura Networks and Telefonica, was first launched in Spain and is now yearly organized in Brazil, Colombia and Ibero-America. It covers 12 different areas: Astronomy, Blog, Games, Modding, Robotics, Simulation, Design, Photography, Music, Video, Development e Open Source. Last year’s creativity session was split up into Design, Photography and Video, so as to better mark the event as a cultural happening.
Like last year, I will also be part of the blogging area. I was invited to participate in a round table on “Blogs in the Classroom” together with Eric Messa (FAAP), Luiz Biajoni (Instituto Macuco), Claudir Segura (PUC-SP) on Wednesday 21st at 16:35. The panel will be moderated by Bob Wollheim (Sixpix Content).
Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the creator of the Web and Pau Garcia-Milà (eyeOS) are some of invited stars and you bet I will be tweeting, photographing and reporting on the event.
Could not resist this invite from Cazé (Espaço Gafanhoto) in my inbox - Black Sheep Only and confirmed my presence for Wednesday, 17th (the Results ON Day) to hear what an intrepid group of web entrepreneurs has to say about innovation, entrepreneurship, how crisis is a synonym to opportunity, reflect on strategies and maybe start partnerships.
A series of quick 30-minute talks has been scheduled, during which each entrepreneur will present their projects and plans. It is also the launch of the special edition of the ResultsON Startups highlighting the best 2008 startups and entrepreneurs, some of whom I have befriended during blogcamps and barcamps. Edney (Interney and Pólvora) invited me for a round table on educational blogs at the next Campus Party in January 2009 and promised to give this poor educator some tips on how to survive in this Brave New World.
The event is being supported/sponsored by Sebrae, Senac and Nokia.
Agenda
14:30 Opening
15:00 Fiore Mangona (Nokia) - Innovation and (R)evolution
15:30 Alexandre Thomé (Endeavor) - Why venture out now?
16:00 Luiz Colombo (Motiv) - Digital signage
16:30 Emerson Calegaretti (MySpace) - Web business
17:00 Edney Souza (Pólvora) - Social Media
17:30 Intervalo
18:00 Franco Lazzuri (Cietec) - Let’s invest
18:30 Ariel e Mackeenzy (Videolog / TiVi) - Creating new businesses
19:00 Daniel Heise (Customer First) - Innovating
19:30 Manoel Fernandes (Bites) - The meeting of 2 worlds: blogs and businesses
20:00 Alexandre Fugita (Startupi) - The art of starting up
20:30 Johny Carvalho (PontoMobi) - Opening new markets
21:00 Aleksandar Mandic (Mandic) - The entrepreneur: a black sheep?
21:30 Launch ResultsON Startups
21:45 Cocktails and night out
Ewout ter Haar (STOA) and Carolina Rossinni (Berkman Centre) organized an open informal meeting on Open Educational Resources at USP last Friday morning. Invited international speakers, Melissa Hagemann ( OSI ) and Joel Thierstein ( Associate Provost from Rice University and CEO from Connexions ) came together with a group of Brazilian academics to give a brief outline of their projects and discuss issues like sustainability, federated architectures for OER implementation, Creative Commons Licenses, the impact of such projects on intellectual property and the implications for the publishing industry. It was interesting to participate in this event, get to know what is happening here and the issues faced. (presentations can be found here).
After an explanation of the work conducted at the Open Society Institute and a brief outline of the history of the Open Education movement and initiatives, Melissa pointed to The Cape Town Open Education Declaration, which is
at once a statement of principle, a statement of strategy and a statement of commitment… meant to spark dialogue, to inspire action and to help the open education movement grow.
1741 individuals (1742 now that I have added my name) and 177 organizations have signed the declaration. Pilot countries comprise Poland, Australia and Brazil.
Some open repositories (which do not require a subscription fee) : Arxiv, DOAJ, Dspace, PubMedCentral, OpenDoar, Eprints Soton, Scielo Brazil, Hindawi, Public Library of Science, Springer Open Choice, Bioline International.
While Connexions founder Richard Baraniuk was discussing OER at the Berlin Online Educa, Joel Thierstein, Cnx’S executive director, showed us (here in São Paulo) how their open source platform allows professors and teachers to “Create Globally, Educate Locally” by giving them the possibility to create, collaborate, build/share custom collections. Users and authors can find content on a page by page basis through an interconnected repository (400+ textbooks, 7000+ lego modules from students, teachers, professionals worldwide) and remix it for their needs. Authors retain copyright and license it via open access licence to share, copy and transmit the content. Hard cover copies of personalised textbooks created by mashups of different content were passed around.
Differently from the States and other developed countries, in Brazil, information and expertise are still scarce, which reinforces the educational gap between the haves and have-nots. Ironically, state funded and free higher-ed ( like the University of São Paulo) cater for the higher middle-class who paid for their studies in private secondary schools and preparatory courses to succeed in the university entrance exam. The federal campuses are usual far from the city centre and transport difficult for those without a car. As a result of this, the most needy have to pay high tuition for overcrowded “one size fits it all” night classes at private commercial institutions, many of which of doubtful standard. In formal or vocational education, there is no recognition of prior and experiential learning, which further restricts the entry of qualified people to help out as facilitators, guides or curators.
OERs and open education should be more than “a blip on the educational radar”. It is important to have access not only to broadband and resources but also peers and experts who help learners filter, discuss, re-mix, create and make this content personally and contextually meaningful.
I hope these first steps will allow Brazilian educators from all extractions find a way to collaborate and partner in networks beyond their schools and universities - across the river in the city of knowledge as Gilson Schwartz put it and share instead of just “planning to share” so that more people and initiatives follow to open access to meaningful and dynamic education in our country.
Last August, I was honoured to receive an invitation from Larry Johnson and Alan Levine to join the New Media Consortium (NMC) 2008-9 Horizon Project Advisory Board (pdf file), a multi-disciplinary and international team whose annual work informs the annual Horizon Report on Emerging Technologies for teaching, learning and creative expression. I was a bit taken by surprise as I am not American, do not represent any institution and am not a “regular” member of the organization. Alan assured me that my experience in using new technologies and wide network were of interest, though. According to him, the NMC wants to reach out more internationally by inviting non Anglo-Saxon members to contribute with their perspectives and get more exposure in Spanish and Portuguese speaking countries. Some steps in this direction:
It has been enlightening to contribute to and participate in this carefully constructed process (totally online and open). The experience , as Larry puts it,
is like a crash course in emerging technology, with the class made up entirely of very knowledgeable experts and futurists.
I also echo Scott Leslie’s words in his post “The Value of Openness - creating the Horizon Project, out in the open.
while I hope you do find the report useful when it comes out in late January 2009, you too can derive much the same benefit as I simply because the process to advise on the Report takes place ‘out in the open’ on this wiki. Indeed, I honestly find the raw materials gathered in the Research Questions (as well as the ongoing hz09 tag in delicious) to be ultimately the most valuable part of the process; inevitably, in order to create a ‘unified’ picture that can be summed up in a printed report certain details are lost, smushed together, improved upon, etc. But all of the raw materials are there for anyone who cares to dig.
Since my exposure to the Future of Learning in a Networked World series of unconferences and during this sabbatical year, I have taken advantage to open myself up to different local communities, participate in various national educational and cultural initiatives and meet the actors. This roaming exposure (one is usually confined to a professional track, idea or a classroom) and free (but expensive) time has allowed me to observe, compare and reflect on the mores and cultural traits of the different groups locally and internationally.
Participating in the Brazilian Práxis community this year has been one of many such instructive insights. It introduced me to fellow colleagues in different institutions in São Paulo, who are in some way or another involved in the use of new technologies. Like the NMC, Práxis aims at convening people around ideas and practice, catalyze dialogue, discussion and contributions to the field in the form of cases, papers, demonstrations and other related projects.
However, differently from NMC, an NGO which relies on paid membership and whose open initiative projects happen mostly online to include perspectives, discussions and research from organizations all over the US and abroad, the Práxis community activities are basically local and presential (São Paulo city) and supported/directed by the Bradesco Institute of Technology, which is in turn funded by the Bradesco Foundation.
In 2004, a small group of K12 ICT coordinators and CIOs from the private school sector in São Paulo gathered at the occasion of an e-learning event to exchange ideas, practice and better get to know each other. In 2008, although most community members still represent these elite institutions, membership has opened up to encompass a variety of new people (who are selected through personal nomination), including technical schools, colleges, universities, edtech, e-learning businesses and big corporations. Membership is renewed annually by a public acceptance to follow at least 70% of the face to face monthly meetings, during which practice/experience or products (100% proprietary until now) are demonstrated. The Moodle environment serves as a communication distributor, information archive and occasional discussion forum.
I have noticed there is a striking difference between the way innovation is envisaged and practiced. Is it this a result of a national or an organizational culture? Is it local, global or both?
Last night, during our last meeting of the year, Alexandre Zapparoli, from Gartner (Brasil) and Yang Sik Pak, from Daul Soft Brasil made their presentations.

Gartner Hype Cycle 2008
Now, although Gartner partners and networks with institutions and consultants to track breakthrough ideas and how they become established and part of general practice, it targets basically the corporate world business leaders in th etechnology/communications industry. Its research process and methods are totally closed and the advice reports are delivered for a high fee.
I noticed that the data collected and the trends openly suggested by educators for the 2009 Horizon Report did not differ significantly from the ones presented in the graphic above. The focus and objective are a bit different, though.
Gartner recommends an open and free form adaptive structure, open to participation and modification, visible work in progress and create_organize_find_interact flow instead of rigid schemes, access rights, templates and costly infrequent change. Organization should reflect current use and needs and natural group formation should be based on activities and interests. Links, tags, ratings and usage are to determine importance and quality. One should find content through people links and people through content links. Interaction records reinforce personal and group identity, reputation and memory.
As for Daul’s authoring tool combo (TeachingMate and LectureMaker) , although it evidences progress over the ready-made one-size-fits-all software, it still operates in the closed environment model, centred on transmission mode, which does not help transform the educational practice but perpetuates the sage on the stage, closed silos and expensive walled gardens.
Education, IMHO, is much more complex than a linear series of events, a politician’s discourse /short-term policy or a measurable and defined pre-packaged product. Learning is a process of reactions and layers which lasts a life-time.
The age of information and knowledge has led education into the media and big business spotlight and schools/colleges and universities have fallen into the vicious circle of student /teacher bashing. Will educational institutions and businesses ever understand that transplanting a foreign model, installing an LMS system, revamping a classroom with a whiteboard, or submitting and enforcing the use of new technologies will not automatically lead to change? Focus on people rather than technology, enable and support processes and weave in connections and possibilities for empowerment.
In spite of the innovative discourse and good intentions of many, I still feel that in the country of Paulo Freire and the government’s innovative initiative to support OSS, banking education and delivery practices are still a strong reality. Too many have no or very restricted access to information and social connections and many are paying too high a price for it.Mike Bogle asked a question last week. Being somewhat chaotically organized these days, I failed to answer him in time for his presentation - sorry Mike :(.
His question - “I’m wondering if you have a guestimate on the current number of active participants” - is valuable as we move to wrap up mode in CCK08, so I’ll tackle it anyway.
First, my time. I have spend a minimum of 12 hours per week on CCK08. Some weeks, especially at the start, were likely closer to about 30 hours. On average, my time breakdown weekly is as follows:
I posted on my course prep time earlier - just can’t remember where. I should have kept slightly better notes, but my time spent in advance of the course in organization, pulling together readings, chats with Stephen, Dave, and others, planning interaction, creating the syllabus, setting up the site/blog/wiki are comfortably in the 60-80 hour range.
Total time I spent on CCK08: between 375-425 hours.
Ok. On to Mike’s question: How many people are still active?
Well, The Daily still has over 1800 people signed up. This means they, a) don’t know how to unsubscribe or b) are at least somewhat engaged. The moodle forum has fairly active discussion, though their are likely less than 50 participants that have been regular participants. The Second Life group has met numerous times, but I don’t know the stats or attendance numbers or their recent activity. Fleep Tuque has some thoughts on SL, but doesn’t really provide information on numbers attending and frequency of meetings. Blogs are fairly wide ranging. There is some overlap with moodle contributions, but many are only blogging. Numbers are hard to guess, but I would say we have about 35 people who are still blogging. Others have not created their own blog, but have participated through comments to those who were blogging. Delicious shows almost 1200 tags for CCK08, Google Blog Search shows just under 9000 references to CCK08, and the list of small, fragmented contributions goes on across the multiple forums and sites that comprise “being online” today.
What has been the impact of CCK08?
I don’t know. I have spoken to people at conferences who have said “I’m a student in your course”. But I often don’t recognize their name. Since CCK08 started, I’ve had the same experience at every conference I’ve presented: ALT-C in Leeds, COHERE in Torontoa, Web 2.0 in Portugal, NW Elearning Conference in Pasco, multiple presentations in Australia, Corporate Learning: Trends and Innovations online conference, and last week at E-Learn in Las Vegas. The numbers I cited above - less than 200 active participants across multiple spaces - seems small in light of the number of learners we had sign up (about 2400 at one stage, I believe). This doesn’t take account of individuals that will access the course resources after the course is officially done. If the online conferences we ran last year at University of Manitoba are any indication, access after the event exceeds during-event participation.
By way of a final analysis, thousands came, less stayed, and even less contributed. Did we change the world? No. Not yet. But we (and I mean all course participants, not just Stephen and I) managed to explore what is possible online. People self-organized in their prefered spaces. They etched away at the hallowed plaque of “what it means to be an expert”. They learned in transparent environments, and in the process, became teachers to others. Those that observed (or lurked as is the more common term), hopefully found value in the course as well. Perhaps life circumstances, personal schedule, motivation for participating, confidence, familiarity with the online environment, or numerous other factors, impacted their ability to contribute. While we can’t “measure them” the way I’ve tried to do with blog and moodle participants, their continued subscription to The Daily and the comments encountered in F2F conferences suggest they also found some value in the course.
All in all. It was fun. I’ll try and pull together more cohesive reflections over the next few weeks. As will Stephen and the numerous participants, I imagine.